![]() ![]() ![]() What is the difference between the two, which is more efficient right now?” – From “I know AVC was developed by Sony, and VC-1 was developed by Microsoft. It’s pretty good(no problem) when I play “Blade Runner” final cut blu-ray(VC-1 ), but when I play “Inception”(same VC-1 ), it’s pretty laggy… what’s wrong, guys? Isn’t VC-1 hardware decoded already by S805 and well support by Kodi?” – from “Kodi 14.2 Helix, a tv box with amlogic s805+ android 4.4.2 with 1GB ram, branded MXQ. I remember there was talking some years ago that VC1 was inferior to AVC, that VC1 uses to soften picture and was only efficient on low data rates (as with HD-DVD, many early Warner HD-DVD and BD shared the same encode) but AVC renders more picture quality and that’s why VC1 was almost abandoned. Your opinion on this subject?” – from and Universal on BD, which used the VC1 codec for video. “I’ve been watching latelly some early releases from Warner Bros. Many devices and media player can’t stream AC-1 Blu-rays. Why? That’s because some Blu-rays are encoded with AC-1 instead of AVC/h.264. However, sometimes, they found that they couldn’t play their Blu-ray MKV rips even in the powerful Kodi. 05:26 am / Posted by Diana Joan | Categories: Blu-ray ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2022
Categories |